US prices from official stores, checked on November 9, 2026 · 14 thermal monoculars compared · no paid scores

Head-to-head · US prices checked November 9, 2026

Pulsar Axion 2 XG35 vs Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XG35

Of 4 decided criteria, the Axion 2 XG35 wins 1 and the Axion 2 LRF XG35 wins 3, on official specs.

Pulsar Axion 2 XG35
Pulsar · No. 4 in our ranking

Pulsar Axion 2 XG35

8.8Very good · out of 10
  • 640x480 sensor with 12 µm pixels behind a 35 mm F1.0 germanium lens, according to Pulsar
  • Pocket body, 380 g with the battery, IPX7 submersion rating
  • Swappable APS5 battery rated at up to 7 hours, 16 GB recorder and Wi-Fi to the Stream Vision 2 app

1 criterion won · $2,499.97, checked on November 9, 2026

Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XG35
Pulsar · No. 2 in our ranking

Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XG35

8.9Very good · out of 10
  • Same 640x480, 12 µm sensor and 35 mm F1.0 lens as the Axion 2 XG35
  • Built-in 905 nm laser rangefinder, up to 1,000 m with ±1 m accuracy (Pulsar figures)
  • IPX7, swappable APS5 battery rated at up to 7 hours

3 criteria won · $2,999.97, checked on November 9, 2026

Images: manufacturers · Some links are affiliate links: we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. It never changes our scores.

Short answer: the Axion 2 LRF XG35 ($2,999.97) is worth the extra $500 if you need exact distances for stalks, calls or shots. If you only spot and scout, the Axion 2 XG35 ($2,499.97) gives the same image. Both were sold out on the Pulsar US store on November 9, 2026.

Add a third monocular in the comparison tool ↗

Criterion by criterion

The best stated value is marked "Edge". If either maker does not state a value, the criterion is left undecided.

CriterionAxion 2 XG35Axion 2 LRF XG35
Calculated scoreEdge: the highest8.8/108.9/10
Checked priceEdge: the lowest$2,499.97$2,999.97
Sensor640×480, 12 µm640×480, 12 µm
NETD (sensitivity)<40 mK<40 mK
Objective lens35 mm F135 mm F1
Computed reach1,750 m (1,914 yd)1,750 m (1,914 yd)
Horizontal field of view12.5°12.5°
DisplayAMOLED 1024×768AMOLED HD 1024×768
Battery life7 h7 h
Swappable batteryYesYes
WeightEdge: the lightest380 g (13.4 oz)350 g (12.3 oz)
Laser rangefinderEdge: the longestNoYes, 1,000 m
Water protectionIPX7IPX7
Recording storage16 GB16 GB
Frame rate50 Hz50 Hz
Warranty3 years3 years

What the numbers mean

Pulsar uses the same core in both: 640×480 sensor with 12 µm pixels at 50 Hz, a 35 mm F1.0 germanium lens, 2.5 to 20x with 8x digital zoom, a 1024×768 AMOLED, the APS5 battery rated at 7 hours, 16 GB, Wi-Fi and IPX7. Reach is identical by our formula.

The LRF version adds a 905 nm laser rated to 1,000 m with ±1 m accuracy and, per Pulsar's figures, weighs 0.35 kg against 0.38 kg with battery for the plain version. That is the whole difference, and it is a useful one: a 50-yard error at night changes a stalk.

Verdict by profile

No absolute winner: the right choice depends on where and what you watch. Each verdict follows from the data above.

Tight budget

Pulsar Axion 2 XG35

The Axion 2 XG35 costs $500 less than the Axion 2 LRF XG35, at prices checked on November 9, 2026.

Read the review ↗
Best overall score

Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XG35

The Axion 2 LRF XG35 scores 8.9/10 against 8.8/10 with our published formula.

Read the review ↗
Pocket carry

Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XG35

The Axion 2 LRF XG35 weighs 350 g with its battery against 380 g for the Axion 2 XG35.

Read the review ↗
Knowing the distance

Pulsar Axion 2 LRF XG35

The Axion 2 LRF XG35 has a laser rangefinder (up to 1,000 m by Pulsar's figure); the Axion 2 XG35 does not, so you estimate distance yourself.

Read the review ↗

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, the Axion 2 XG35 or the Axion 2 LRF XG35?

With our published overall formula, the Axion 2 LRF XG35 scores higher (8.9 vs 8.8/10). The best pick still depends on where and what you hunt or watch: see the picks by profile on this page.

What is the price difference between the Axion 2 XG35 and the Axion 2 LRF XG35?

On November 9, 2026, the Axion 2 XG35 was $2,499.97 (Pulsar US store) and the Axion 2 LRF XG35 $2,999.97 (Pulsar US store). The Axion 2 XG35 was shown as sold out there. The Axion 2 LRF XG35 was shown as sold out there.

Which one sees farther?

Both have the same computed reach (1,750 m) with our formula: lens focal length divided by pixel pitch, for 3 pixels on a 1.8 m target.

Which one is lighter?

The Axion 2 LRF XG35: 350 g against 380 g with a battery fitted, from the makers' figures.